NeurIPS 2026 Workshop

AI Data Readiness for Scientific Discovery

Data Infrastructure and Benchmarks for Reliable Scientific AI Systems.

One-day in-person workshop Paris, France December 12 or 13, 2026

Key dates

Submission August 29, 2026 11:59 p.m. AoE
Notification September 29, 2026 11:59 p.m. AoE
Camera-ready To be announced
Workshop December 12 or 13, 2026 Paris, France

Dates are tentative; the workshop day in Paris will be confirmed once provided.

Overview

Scientific AI is moving from curated prediction tasks toward systems that work directly with experimental data: foundation models, retrieval systems, and agents that query scientific knowledge, run analyses, and support follow-up decisions.

AIDaR focuses on two problems in this transition — how scientific data should be organized so models and agents can use it, and how evaluations should determine where frontier models are reliable. The workshop brings together researchers, industry scientists, and engineers building scientific data systems, foundation models, agents, biomedical evaluations, and industrial assay platforms.

Preliminary program — additional speakers and panelists will be announced.

Invited speakers

Max Welling
Max WellingUniversity of Amsterdam
Marianna Rapsomaniki
Marianna RapsomanikiUniversity of Lausanne
Arjun Raj
Arjun RajCellular Intelligence
Xinyi Zhang
Xinyi ZhangAithyra

Panelists

Harihara Muralidharan
Harihara MuralidharanLatchBio
Kexin Huang
Kexin HuangPhylo / Biomni
Karin Hrovatin
Karin HrovatinMerck KGaA
Pablo Meyer Rojas
Pablo Meyer RojasIBM Research / DREAM
Jon Laurent
Jon LaurentEdison Scientific
Stefan Harrer
Stefan HarrerSanofi

Workshop details

Data infrastructure for scientific AI

Scientific data must move from raw measurements into forms that models, retrieval systems, and agents can use: linking files to samples and assay conditions, preserving the steps that produced an analysis-ready dataset, and representing scientific relationships as tables, graphs, or knowledge networks. Topics include scientific foundation models, relational and graph-structured data, multimodal biomedical measurements, workflow systems, and large industrial datasets used for model training and wet-lab feedback.

Evaluations for scientific AI

Scientific AI systems should be tested on tasks that resemble real scientific work: choosing inputs, running analyses, checking controls, interpreting noisy results, and recovering biological or physical conclusions from data. Topics include biological reasoning, practical data analysis, retrieval over structured scientific knowledge, multimodal biomedical data, failure analysis, and studies of where performance changes across assays, platforms, or workflows.

Format

Structure. Short invited talks, central contributed work, poster and demo sessions, and breakout groups that produce short written outputs for the post-workshop report.

Talks. Invited talks open with scientific data systems and ground the evaluation discussions in biomedical data.

Panels. Panel 1 asks how to build evaluations that approximate real scientific work rather than ranking models on static benchmarks. Panel 2 covers the infrastructure that makes experimental data usable by scientific AI systems.

Breakouts. Groups will examine real use-cases, considering how scientific datasets, metadata, and human feedback should be organized for model and agent use, as well as the conceptual framing of the AI data readiness problem. Amongst confirmed session leaders are Brandon White (Axiom), Fabio Boniolo and Matthew Osman (Polyphron).

Call for papers

We invite technical papers, benchmarks and evaluations, data-system reports, workflow and tool demos, and failure analyses. Submissions should connect data organization or evaluation design to downstream model or agent behavior on scientific tasks.

Submission types

Full papers (up to 8 pages) present complete work: a scientific data system, benchmark, or evaluation, with methods, results, and analysis.

Short papers (up to 4 pages) present focused contributions, work in progress, position pieces, or tool and dataset demos.

Formatting and review

  • Papers must use the NeurIPS 2026 style files; references and appendices are excluded from the page limit.
  • Reviewing is double-blind; anonymize the submission and any linked material.
  • Disclose any use of large language models and their role.
  • The workshop is non-archival.
  • OpenReview is the official submission system. You may optionally add a checked, machine-readable copy of your project through AIDaRS, our GitHub review pilot.

Tentative schedule

08:45Arrival and opening remarks
09:10Invited talks: data infrastructure for scientific AI
10:30Contributed spotlights
11:20Panel 1: Benchmarking AI on practical biology
12:00Poster and demo session, lunch
13:15Invited talks: biomedical data and evaluation
14:00Contributed spotlights
14:50Poster and demo session, coffee
15:40Breakout groups
16:25Panel 2: Engineering assay data systems that models and agents can use
17:05Breakout report-out and closing remarks

Organizers

Michal Rosen-Zvi
Michal Rosen-ZviHebrew University / Merck KGaA
Zoe Piran
Zoe PiranStanford / Roche / Genentech
Kenny Workman
Kenny WorkmanLatchBio
Edaeni Hamid
Edaeni HamidRoche / Genentech
Vladimir Ermakov
Vladimir ErmakovEdison Scientific
Arindam Sett
Arindam SettRoche / Genentech
Sina Booeshaghi
Sina BooeshaghiUC Berkeley

Advisory Board

Aviv Regev
Aviv RegevRoche / Genentech
Sam Rodriques
Sam RodriquesEdison Scientific
Mohsen Hejrati
Mohsen HejratiApple
Arvind Rajpal
Arvind RajpalMerck KGaA
Lior Pachter
Lior PachterCaltech